News Coverage of Social Class: Madeline McCann and Shannon Matthews
1. Find examples of
language used in each of the pieces to describe the parents of both children.
How does this language differ? What are the messages and values on social
class? (10 marks)
One of the examples
that the article uses to describe the Madeline case is to show when and where
the abduction had occurred. The quote "Near Pria da Luz where the family
had been staying in a holiday apartment when Madeline was abducted 24 days ago",
you can tell from this that the McCann's are quite wealthy that they can afford
to stay in an apartment abroad. The place where they are staying is a quite
lavish area where tourist usually go to stay, the Algarve is actually
rich with interesting buildings and beautiful countryside that mainly
middle-class people can go to. From reading this the viewers can detect
that the McCann’s are middle/upper class people and people who are able to rent
out an apartment in Portugal. I think the message is loud and clear that since
the McCann’s went on holiday and lost their child in a different place that
isn’t home gains a lot more sympathy towards the audience than how Shannon
Matthews was lost around her home, which could be why there was a huge
difference between the two stories.
You can see how raw
the article was towards Shannon’s cases, because of the information that they
shared. The information what was shared was previous history on her mother’s
life where its stated that “Miss Matthews, who has seven children to five
fathers” this reveals how complex and long the case was, unlike Madeline’s
case, they didn’t need to do any sort of background check of her family, which
then again shows the norm of a ‘nuclear family’ that was a typical ‘happy
family’.
Another way you can spot a difference of language on articles, is in the McCann’s family. You can see how caring and responsible she is as a mother towards her children. You can tell this from when she says, “You just don’t expect anything like that in a million years. We triple checked. We wanted to believe she was there. We had absolutely no doubt that’s she has been taken”, this shows how concerned and affectionate her mother is towards Madeline, because she made sure to triple check, and maybe because she’s such a good mother she and her partner never expected their child to be missing like this. The quotations that are used are quite personalise which connects towards the readers and creates sympathy for her mother. This also goes back to that ‘nuclear family’ where the mother takes very good care of her children and knows them thoroughly. It displays how a middle-class family is much more involved and cares a lot about their families unlike the working class. You can see in Matthews case that her mother is apposite to this to the point where her motherhood is accused for the wrong. “one of the friends allegedly claimed that Miss Matthews had known where Shannon was throughout the 24-day search”, just this reveals how irresponsible and is a deceiver Karen is because even her own friend is able to doubt on her and claim that Karen knew where she was. Karen’s character is questioned and doubted which you hardly see happening to a middle-class person go through but because Karen has a dysfunctional family and is a working-class woman she can easily be doubted on.
2. Analyse the choice of pictures used in terms of framing, shot type and mise-en-scene. Compare their representations of the social class of the two families. (10 marks)
The daily telegraph has chosen to display an image of Madeline and Kate together. The image is a mid-shot where you can see the subjects body and what they’re doing. It could be that Kate may have taken her daughter to the park and there both on the slide together were she’s holding her hand helping her on the slide. This display her love and care towards Madeline as she’s holding on to her. This definitely shows the blissful moments that they once shared while they were together. Madeline is wearing a pink top which connotes a sense of girliness, delicacy and sweet personality just like any other girl. The way daily telegraph has chosen to exhibits this image shows how they sympathise with the whole story hence why they decided to post such a comforting image. You would expect this type of image from middle class typical childhood is often characterized by an authoritative parenting approach with a combination of parental warmth, support and control. Parents set some rules establishing limits, but overall this approach creates a greater sense of trust, security, and self-confidence. The middle-class parents' involvement in their children's lives underlines their recognition of its importance. So, when you see Madeline and Kate together you can realise the boundaries and rules they set, by letting her child enjoy and have fun at the park.
Another way you can spot a difference of language on articles, is in the McCann’s family. You can see how caring and responsible she is as a mother towards her children. You can tell this from when she says, “You just don’t expect anything like that in a million years. We triple checked. We wanted to believe she was there. We had absolutely no doubt that’s she has been taken”, this shows how concerned and affectionate her mother is towards Madeline, because she made sure to triple check, and maybe because she’s such a good mother she and her partner never expected their child to be missing like this. The quotations that are used are quite personalise which connects towards the readers and creates sympathy for her mother. This also goes back to that ‘nuclear family’ where the mother takes very good care of her children and knows them thoroughly. It displays how a middle-class family is much more involved and cares a lot about their families unlike the working class. You can see in Matthews case that her mother is apposite to this to the point where her motherhood is accused for the wrong. “one of the friends allegedly claimed that Miss Matthews had known where Shannon was throughout the 24-day search”, just this reveals how irresponsible and is a deceiver Karen is because even her own friend is able to doubt on her and claim that Karen knew where she was. Karen’s character is questioned and doubted which you hardly see happening to a middle-class person go through but because Karen has a dysfunctional family and is a working-class woman she can easily be doubted on.
2. Analyse the choice of pictures used in terms of framing, shot type and mise-en-scene. Compare their representations of the social class of the two families. (10 marks)
The daily telegraph has chosen to display an image of Madeline and Kate together. The image is a mid-shot where you can see the subjects body and what they’re doing. It could be that Kate may have taken her daughter to the park and there both on the slide together were she’s holding her hand helping her on the slide. This display her love and care towards Madeline as she’s holding on to her. This definitely shows the blissful moments that they once shared while they were together. Madeline is wearing a pink top which connotes a sense of girliness, delicacy and sweet personality just like any other girl. The way daily telegraph has chosen to exhibits this image shows how they sympathise with the whole story hence why they decided to post such a comforting image. You would expect this type of image from middle class typical childhood is often characterized by an authoritative parenting approach with a combination of parental warmth, support and control. Parents set some rules establishing limits, but overall this approach creates a greater sense of trust, security, and self-confidence. The middle-class parents' involvement in their children's lives underlines their recognition of its importance. So, when you see Madeline and Kate together you can realise the boundaries and rules they set, by letting her child enjoy and have fun at the park.
However, if you see
the images that daily telegraph has used in the Shannon Matthews article are
completely different from the McCann’s. The images are close ups of Karen and
Shannon where they aren’t together, and have separate images. You can see how
Karen’s facial expression are quite dull and her face is tilted downwards and
her eyes are facing the ground. She seems to look emotionless and nonchalant in
the image. The image of Shannon seems like a portrait from her school, where
you can tell from her expressions she looks quite happy just like any young
girl would be. She’s also wearing pink top and a pink hair band which shows her
girly personality just like any other normal girl. The individual images
could reveal the real separation between them, after what Karen did to Shannon.
People can expect a
working-class mother to fake a kidnapping since working class people are more
like to be financially unstable. Working-class wages can be very low which
is hard to provide for a family let alone provide for seven children that Karen
has. The mind-set of a working-class person is completely different from a
middle-class person, a working-class person is mainly focused on trying to make
ends meet and busy working most hours, hence why they don’t give much
importance to their children like the middle-class people do.
3. Hall notes that
representation is “contested”, in particular the representation of those with
less power in society. He argues that news coverage can be hierarchical. To what extent is this evident from the two readings? Make reference to
Hall’s theory of representation in your answer. (10 marks)
I agree with hall
because news coverage is hierarchical as they prioritise and favour the rich
and middle-class people more than the poor working-class people. Most news
coverages about hierarchical stories are usually presented in a positive way,
where newspapers display the stories in certain way which the audience has a preferred
reading. And most less hierarchical stories are presented in a negative way,
showing how deprived working-class people are. Those who have less power are certainly
challenged much more than those who have power because they can compete against
them as they don’t have security of such power. I think that those who have
less power have to definitely struggle to prove them themselves as that they don’t
fit in the stereotypical mould that society has created.
You can see this
happening in Shannon Matthews story and Madeline McCann’s story because there
are social differences between them since Madeline belongs to a middle-class
family. Kate is represented as a typical caring mother who she unconditionally
loves Madeline. She’s presented as a good mother who looks out for her children
and is attentive towards them. However, Karen Matthews is represented as a
ignorant and a negligent mother who allowed her daughter to captive and be in
harm for money. She’s presented as a bad mother who did something like this to
her own daughter, when she should be protecting her. And through language, expressions
and signs we are able to tell how each story is being presented.
4. What is the
dominant (intended) meaning of The Daily Telegraph? How is the audience
supposed to feel about the two families? Do you take a negotiated or
oppositional reading and if so, how / why? Make reference to reception theory
in your answer. (15 marks)
For the McCann’s story, I think that the dominant meaning could be that The Daily Telegraph wanted the audience to view the message that they wanted to in a simple form. They want the audience to agree with what they have written and presented so they can get the message across. Being able to show how powerful the McCann’s are as a middle-class family means that middle class families are able to do so much more than working class families. The audience is meant to feel really sympathetic towards the McCann’s family much more because their daughter went missing in a ‘different country’. The fact that she’s been missing in Portugal is used as a token to gain peoples sympathy because no one can imagine losing their child like this. Hence why, the audience has a preferred reading, as they can relate to the grieve that the parents are feeling.
For the Matthew's story,
I think The Daily Telegraph wanted the audience to have a preferred reading
just like the story for McCann’s. So, the audience can still agree with them
even though they had published a negative story about the Matthews. However, I
think the audience would have had a negotiated reading mainly because some of
the audience were able to understand the reasons why Karen did what she did
because of her financial state but some of the audience would not understand
the reasons why because they disagree with that Karen did regardless of any
difficulties she was dealing with they the audience understand this story in
different ways, either in a positive way or a in a negative way. It also
depends whether the audience can and can’t relate with the message that’s being
conveyed because the story is hard to interpret. The audience is supposed to
feel frustrated with what Karen did to her own daughter, because she’s a mother
who’s supposed to protect her daughter and care for her, but she allowed her to
get kidnapped for money just reveals to the audience how much of a bad mother
she is.
The Daily Telegraph
wants the audience to feel different emotions and intakes with different
ideologies and messages from both of the families. Both stories are completely
different from each other which is why they are targeting different audiences,
from social class to morals and values.
This is a very well written, detailed analysis Layba. You apply media language and theory points accurately and you draw on a range of specific examples in your writing. You claim that working class families are busy working, therefore do not give sufficient attention to their children, which seems a rather over-generalised and bizarre claim?! Otherwise, strong work. A grade. Vanessa
ReplyDelete